Suspension
bridges are adopted in places where it is difficult to construct other type of
bridges. For very large spans, they can be adopted economically.
·
In
a suspension bridge, tensile stresses are predominant. Thus it requires high
tensile ropes, which are economical than mild steel trusses etc.
·
During construction, temporary central supports do not need to be
built, and access to the construction is not required from beneath. This means
busy roadways and waterways do not need to be disrupted.
·
The
stresses are directly passed to the supports through cables and suspenders,
hence slender sections are required effecting overall economy.
·
The area spanned by a suspension bridge is very long in proportion
to the amount of materials required to construct bridges.
·
They
are light and require no false work.
·
The
material of construction can be transported easily.
·
The
time of construction is less.
·
They
provide the roadway at a low elevation and have low centre of wind pressure.
·
They
give good aesthetic appearance.
·
They
require no centering for construction.
·
There
is no likely hood of failure during erection and after construction.
·
It
is the safest structure as cables have vast reserve strength.
·
The
chords of the stiffening truss can be repaired without interruption to traffic,
while in other bridges the failure of a single truss member causes collapse of
the bridge.
What are the
advantages/disadvantages of beam,arch, and suspension bridges?
No comments:
Post a Comment