Comparison stone masonry and brick masonry
Construction of
brick masonry is quick as the uniform size and regular shape of bricks
facilitates in maintaining proper alignment. Whereas, the dressing and handling
of stone need more time and extra labour in the construction of stone masonry.
Stone masonry
possesses higher strength, durability and weather resisting quantities than
brick masonry
Brick masonry
has cost of construction is less than stone masonry
Stone has
higher crushing strength than brick .this makes stone suitable for the
construction of dams, piers, docks and other marine structures.
Skilled
labour need to stone masaonry than brick masonry.
In monumental
buildings which require heavy molding with large projections and carving, stone
is suitable whereas brick can be used only for light ornamental work of lesser
importance.
Stone masonry
is more water-tight than the brick masonry.
Stone masonry gives a massive appearance and hence used for monumental works
Stone masonry gives a massive appearance and hence used for monumental works
Well textured
stone masonry of superior quality needs no treatment to improve its appearance.
The apparent defects of brick masonry can be only concealed by plastering.
Generally stone masonry is not damaged by chemicals present in the environment and salts present in water or sewage whereas expected brick masonry reacts and gets disintegrated.
The use of
stone masonry is only appliance are restricted to handle the stone blocks and
bricks can be conveniently moved by manual labour.
The brick
masonry is more fire-resisting than stone masonry.
Great article on the comparison between stone masonry and brick masonry. The company I work for, McGraw-Hill, has a lot of information also. They have a list of top quality manufacturers and suppliers with interesting ideas. You should check them out.
ReplyDeletevery helpful !
ReplyDelete